

Naik - been realised in its entirety, bureaucratic authority would have declined, creating greater room for school autonomy.

Had the vision of the Kothari report - sculpted by its Member-Secretary, J.P.
CROSSHAIRS MEANING FULL
Its full potential would have been realised had school principals and teachers been given a greater say and freedom in establishing the norms that govern institutional life.Īnother gain would have been a participatory role for the community in matters of day-to-day life at school. It led to a significant reorganisation of the administrative system in education. Elsewhere in the country, the 10+2 model recommended by the Kothari Commission nearly 60 years ago prevails. Pre-university or junior colleges are left in only a small number of States now. It is interesting that the uniform controversy erupted in the secondary education system of a State that bypassed major policy reforms of the 1960s. Systematic study of the school dress, its history and fascination, was long overdue.ĭata | Hijab row: Why the ban is a double blow to Muslim girl students

To what extent the politics of the school dress will influence electoral outcomes will become a subject fit for research in the social sciences. The school uniform has mutated into a new political tool, and as a means of curtailing the already limited autonomy of principals and teachers. Thus, one of India’s most literate and prosperous States, globally famous for its advancements in the so-called knowledge economy, has emerged as the crucible of educational orthodoxy and control. Their stance is not difficult to appreciate under the circumstances. And although Kendriya Vidyalayas (central schools) are not governed by any provincial government, the ones located in Karnataka have fallen in line.

Its regime now encompasses the classroom as well as the examination hall.
CROSSHAIRS MEANING CODE
Nicely hemmed in between the order of the Directorate and the court, a complete uniform code has evolved within a few weeks. This short, and obviously generalised social history has little apparent relevance to the situation in Karnataka. In many cases, the schools assented to participate and asked parents to patronise a particular source. Instead of offering competitive pricing, the uniform business encouraged local monopolies. Supply of uniforms for children of different schools offered business opportunities for local cloth merchants, tailors and shoe stores. Gradually, when different types of private schools started, they demanded every day wearing of the prescribed uniform. It was required on certain days of the week and on special days. Rural and small town schools seldom insisted on a daily uniform in the early years of Independence. If you strain popular memories and scan old photographs, you will find that the idea of a school uniform has spread with urbanisation, prosperity and privatisation. Hijab row | Supreme Court tells students it will list plea in two days Systems of education that evolved under colonial rulers of different types generally favour strict enforcement of the school uniform. If you divide the world into countries that have a compulsory uniform in their schools and countries that do not, the history starts to reveal itself. One is that of a garden where different flowers bloom the other is of an army of little soldiers marching together. Uniformly dressed children constitute one of the two archetypal metaphors of schooling. The public fascination with such spectacles, and the history of the school uniform, point to the single most important role that a school uniform plays: it helps in the regimentation of the young. Especially on festive occasions when grand events bring all the schools of a city together, people find something deeply edifying in the spectacle of children marching or displaying their smartness wearing a distinct uniform. When they think about a school, including their own, they think about the uniform that makes its children distinct from the children of other schools. Yet, a lot of people today cannot imagine a school without a uniform. Nowhere in the long history of education can you find evidence to say that a school uniform is a factor in learning.
